2024 Author: Leah Sherlock | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-17 05:25
The plot of many works is eternal. They were relevant in ancient times, have not lost their relevance even now. These include "The Wolf and the Lamb". For the first time, the ancient Greek fabulist Aesop spoke about them. The lamb, suffering from thirst, on a hot summer day, went to the stream and began to drink the cold water. The wolf decided to eat him. Wanting to justify his act, he charged that the lamb muddied the water, which is why now the predator cannot get drunk. The lamb replied that this could not be, because he barely touched the water with his lips, and was downstream. Then Wolf said that in
last year he insulted his father. And here the baby found arguments, because then he had not yet been born, and even if he wanted to, he could not do it. The wolf noticed that the Lamb knew a lot about excuses, but he would still be eaten. If someone decides to commit an evil deed, then nothing will stop him. Such is the moral of the fable "The Wolf and the Lamb". Then the fables of La Fontaine, Sumarokov, Derzhavin were created on the same plot. At the beginning of the 19th century, Krylov wrote the fable of the same name.
Moral of the fable "The Wolf and the Lamb"
There are two main characters in the work, the images of which are important and unthinkable one without the other. The fabulist immediately begins with morality, loudly declaring that when the strong and the powerless collide, the latter will be the one to blame anyway. He further assures the reader that there are many historical examples supporting this conclusion, and cites the well-known episode of the meeting of the Wolf and the Lamb at the stream.
Content."Wolf and Lamb"
The moral of the work, however, is that the predator was already hungry and immediately had the intention of eating someone. The kid was not lucky that it was he who got in his way. If there had been a bunny or a duckling in his place, they would have suffered. The moral of the fable "The Wolf and the Lamb" tells about the hopelessness of the weak. However, the Wolf wants to justify his act and says that the Lamb himself is to blame, as he prevented him from drinking pure water. In refined terms, the Lamb replies that this cannot be, since he is 100 meters downstream. This reasonable and polite answer obviously does not satisfy the wolf. He starts screaming that last year the Lamb was rude to him in the same place. Therefore, the Wolf could not forgive such an insult all year, and now he can take revenge on him. Learning that this could not be, since last year the Lamb had not yet been born, he replies that it was one of his relatives or acquaintances. The lamb reasonably asks, what does it have to do with it, in fact. The wolf exclaims that he is already guilty of the fact that the wolf wants to eat. Then he stops talking to his victim and dragshim into the dark forest.
"Wolf and Lamb". Analysis
There is an opinion that this fable shows the lack of rights of an ordinary person in front of those in power. It becomes clear that the one who is stronger wins, and not the one on whose side justice is. The wolf behaves rudely, realizing its complete impunity. After all, often those who have more power and power do not even have to explain anything and look for excuses for themselves. Krylov understands how difficult it is to stop those who have an advantageous position on their side. This is the moral of the "Wolf and Lamb" fable.
Recommended:
Krylov's fable "The monkey and glasses". content and morality. Analysis
In 1812, Krylov created the fable "The Monkey and Glasses". Since the name of the animal is written with a capital letter, we can assume that in fact it tells not about a monkey, but about a person. The fable tells of a Monkey who, with age, developed vision problems. She shared her trouble with others. Kind people said that glasses can help her see the world more clearly and better. Unfortunately, they forgot to explain exactly how to use them
Fable "Dragonfly and Ant" (Krylov I.A.): content, history of the fable and morality
The heroes of this fable are the Ant and the Dragonfly. In Aesop and Lafontaine, the hardworking character was also called the Ant, but his frivolous interlocutor was called the Cicada, the Beetle and the Grasshopper. It is obvious that the Ant in all countries has become a symbol of hard work, while carelessness is inherent in many. Perhaps Krylov made Dragonfly the second heroine because she is more familiar to our area, while few people know who the cicadas are
Krylov's fable "Elephant and Pug". Moral and content
"The Elephant and the Pug" is one of the most famous works written in this genre. There are two main characters in this fable. Passive is the Elephant. It is unusual for this area, therefore, at the time when it is driven through the streets, crowds gather to look at it. Active dog Pug. She is trying in every possible way to attract the attention of the Elephant and others. For this, Pug barks, squeals and rushes forward
Fable "The Wolf and the Lamb". Let's talk about the works of Aesop and Krylov
One of the most famous fabulists is Aesop and Krylov. These great people can find a work called the fable "The Wolf and the Lamb." The plot of both things is similar, but there are differences
Remembering the classics: the fable "The Wolf and the Lamb", Krylov and Aesop
Krylov wrote his fable "The Wolf and the Lamb" according to the plot invented by Aesop. In this way, he creatively reworked more than one well-known story, creating on its basis an original, original work. Aesop's story is as follows: a lamb drank water from a river. The wolf saw him and decided to eat him
