Analysis of "Duma" Lermontov M.Yu

2024 Author: Leah Sherlock | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-17 05:25

Mikhail Yurievich has a lot of socially significant poems in which he evaluates society and tries to understand what awaits him in the future. An analysis of Lermontov's "Duma" makes it possible to determine that the work belongs to the type of satirical elegy. The poet composed a verse in 1838, in meaning it is very similar to the poem “The Death of a Poet”, only if there the author reproached the court society for inaction and cruelty, then all the nobles are already to blame, he speaks of their indifference and refusal to participate in socio-political events "Duma".

Lermontov wrote the poem in the form of an elegy, this is indicated by the volume and size of the work. But satire is also present here, since the poet speaks about his contemporaries with his usual causticity. Mikhail Yuryevich was a fighter by nature, so he treated with contempt people who resigned themselves to circumstances who did not have any goals in life and aspirations. The poet is skeptical about the socio-social system that leads nowhere, without giving citizens the right to choose, he understands that his generation will face an unenviable fate, it will grow old without having time toapply what you have learned.

Analysis of Lermontov's "Duma" emphasizes that the writer's peers could not decide to take a desperate step and resist the tsarist regime, because they were taught by the bitter experience of their fathers - the Decembrists. The descendants understand that they are not able to change anything, and they will be severely punished for the uprising, therefore they prefer to remain silent, and direct all their knowledge and skills into fruitless science. These people are not characterized by an ardent display of feelings, they do not commit noble deeds and are even afraid to admit to themselves that they want to help others, to make the world a better place.

Analysis of Lermontov's "Duma" shows that the poet considered his contemporaries smart people, but even the most talented of them did not want to change anything. They could be realized, but do not see the need for it. They do not understand why waste time and energy, if in the end nothing works out, no one will hear them. This generation can be considered lost, it has not done anything good for the world, therefore it will grow old without glory and happiness. The most talented and intelligent nobles renounce their past, considering it meaningless and stupid, but they themselves have made absolutely no contribution to the future.

Indifference to social life means spiritual death - that's what M. Lermontov thought. "Duma" only summarized the issues that were topical and painful for the poet. Mikhail Yurievich constantly worried that he would leave nothing for future generations. He considered his work useless and imperfect, years would passand will be forgotten forever. Pushkin's works could claim eternity.

Analysis of Lermontov's "Duma" shows that the poet predicts an inglorious future for himself and his peers. He believes that years will pass and he will be forgotten. But Mikhail Yuryevich was mistaken, his works became part of the classics of Russian literature, although few prose writers and poets of the 19th century were awarded such a fate. Those who are not afraid to speak the truth.