"Voice", season 4: reviews of the jury. The new jury of the show "Voice", season 4: reviews

2024 Author: Leah Sherlock | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-17 05:25

The Voice show is a new hit on domestic television. Unlike all other music programs of the current and past seasons, the show firmly and confidently holds the lead in the race for the attention of the audience. What caused the interest of the public? And what can we expect from the jury of the new season?

A bit of history

Golos is a Russian TV version of The voice, a popular show in Europe, the rights to which were successfully sold to more than fifty countries of the world.

Nevertheless, the domestic version turned out to be a little different: TV viewers noted that our jury, even in the “blind” competition, seeks to guess the appearance of the vocalist, so it turns out not the most impartial assessment of vocal talent. But differences from the original format are inevitable: we have a different stage, different musicians, different mentors and a different opinion about the “right” artist.

TV show format

There were many musical programs in the "talent search" format on domestic television. At one time, for example, the "Star Factory" was popular. But time goes by, everythingis changing. The audience, its tastes and needs are changing, and this is also a factor that you need to adapt to. Viewers became uninteresting to watch the same young artists singing to the soundtrack. So, it took a show where the emphasis will be on something completely different. This explains the popularity of the Voice project in our country - there are completely different participants and live vocals.

Rules and jury

As in the original TV show, the main criterion for judging the contestants is the voice. It is the lively and strong vocals that enable the jury members to evaluate the artist and choose the best ones for passing to the next stage. Each mentor is a recognized master of the national music scene. His task is to select the participants in his team, relying only on hearing. After the stage of "blind auditions", the format of the program turns into a fight "for elimination" between the contestants. And it is on the mentors that the spectacular performances and the correct choice of numbers necessary to unlock the potential of each of the selected artists depend. The jury carefully selects the repertoire for all their wards, passing on musical experience during rehearsals.

The goal of the show is not to make a new star out of the artists, the essence of the project is in the teamwork of the mentor and the ward, which sometimes results in completely unexpected and unformatted numbers. Most of the already formed, albeit unknown, artists come to the casting of "Voices". Therefore, the composition of the jury is very important for them.

Mentors from previous seasons

Jury teamthe show "Voice" has undergone changes. Initially, the candidates experienced both criticism and approval. The panel of judges for the first three seasons included Alexander Gradsky, Leonid Agutin, Dima Bilan and singer Pelageya. It turned out quite a "live" team.

The format of the TV show determined a clear division of mentors by musical genre. Thus, the participants who impressed the jury had the right to choose the teacher who impressed them the most. All four mentors quickly won the love of viewers with their impartiality, professionalism and sincere desire to discover new talents. The audience was looking forward to new releases and worried about the contestants they liked. The show confidently took a leading position in the rating of the television network, and the number of people wishing to participate in the sensational project grew exponentially.

Transfer of masters' experience

The show "Voice" immediately distinguished itself with its atmosphere. Against the background of other vocal programs, it was precisely the attitude of the jury members towards their wards that distinguished him. Participation in every performance, genuine experiences, respect for the participants - these qualities were appreciated by the audience in mentors. "Voice" did not become another "bride", instead of this, a professional and adult show appeared. Candidates for the jury of the project were selected no less carefully than the participants. Preference was given not to the popularity and promotion of the artist, but to real talent, authority and merit in the musical field. Therefore, there was no doubt about the professionalism of previous mentors. All of them could be liked or not liked by the audience, but the opinions of the audience always converged on one thing - each of them has come a long way, has rich experience, and can teach the contestants a lot. And the peculiar division of the jury members into musical genres is a confirmation of this: the project brought together real masters of the Russian stage, fully realized in their field. But that was before.

The intrigue of the fourth season

After the end of the third "Voice" viewers were looking forward to the new season. And many asked a difficult question: will the past mentors remain? It would seem that the composition of the jury of the project has already fully developed and cannot be changed, but rumors about changes have appeared. Viewers began to wonder who would be replaced, and, most importantly, by whom, and then the leadership of Channel One officially announced the change in the jury of the popular project, but refused to disclose the names of the new heroes. The reasons for such measures were called very different, but the result remained unchanged: in the new season, viewers did not see Dima Bilan, Pelageya and Leonid Agutin, who fell in love.

New jury. The Voice Season 4

The names of the mentors were kept secret to the last, even polls were offered with candidate options. There were whole discussions about who deserved to take vacant places on the rating TV show. In the end, season 4 began with a premiere and the presentation of the updated jury. To the delight of the audience and the contestants, Alexander Borisovich Gradsky did not go anywhere. The rest of the composition has undergone drastic changes: the previous masters were replaced byPolina Gagarina, Grigory Leps and Vasily Vakulenko, better known under the pseudonym Basta.

The new mentors did not cause much surprise, many assumed a similar outcome. But questions crept in about whether the jury members of the new season were fairly chosen. Is getting a judge's seat connected with something other than professionalism? Why exactly Polina Gagarina and right now? And does Grigory Leps fit into the transmission format?

A negative reaction is also a reaction

The new jury of the show "Voice" … The 4th season of the project began with this. And if initially viewers perceived the news positively, then with each new release, a wave of indignation and misunderstanding grows. On the one hand, the candidacies of all three are very understandable, moreover, Grigory Leps and Polina Gagarina already had similar experience in the programs “Main Stage” and “I Want to Meladze”. On the other hand, is it a good choice?

One can understand the stormy reaction of the audience to the jury of the show "Voice" - many were waiting for season 4 largely thanks to the well-coordinated team of the presenter and mentors, who were no less interesting to watch than the contestants. But the new season could not justify the hopes of viewers, the project groups on social networks were filled with negative feedback from listeners about the jury of the 4th season. The Voice is still on the Friday TV schedule, but for how long?

"Voice", season 4. Jury reviews

At one time the project of the First Channel, which exploded the ratings, is now rapidly losing ground. What is it connected with? Is the format of the showredeemed himself? Or does a new jury make itself felt? "Voice", season 4 especially, has always united the opinions of the audience in a peculiar way. But if initially the audience paid more attention to the participants, then in the new episodes a flurry of indignation fell on the mentors themselves and the creators of the TV show.

After the start of new issues, more and more people are talking about the jury. "Voice" (season 4) has become one of the most talked about. There were a lot of posts, polls and negative comments. Viewers are actively expressing their opinion about the new jury of the Voice project: season 4 has become the most discussed in the history of domestic adaptation, but for some reason in a negative way.

If we recall the first programs, then Alexander Borisovich Gradsky was mainly criticized - many did not agree with his statements and assessments. Now the opposite is true: it was the master who earned most of the audience's approval, unlike Polina Gagarina and Grigory Leps. It is their viewers who highlight in their comments. The overall picture of the jury reviews - "The Voice", season 4, turned out to be a failure.

Of all the new mentors, only rapper Basta falls out of the stream of general criticism, he was received rather restrainedly, noting his inherent reasonable rigor and prudence, and it was Vasily Vakulenko who caused the most questions even before the start of the season. As for Polina Gagarina, the audience was unanimous: this artist does not reach the title of mentor.

She is accused of insincerity, the desire to copy Pelageya, antics and bias. Yes, of course, Polina Gagarina is a talented singer who is now at the peak of her career and at the zenith of fame, but The Voice is not the project she needs. Grigory Leps also caused a huge public outcry, receiving more than unflattering marks.

Many noted his unwillingness to delve into the essence of what is happening, rudeness and incompetence. Thus, we can conclude that for the new composition of the jury "Voice" (season 4) received not the best reviews.

Change of mentors=change of format?

The rapid loss of rankings after the start of the new season is a bad omen. It is likely that the leadership of Channel One will come to the same opinion, and we are again waiting for changes. Perhaps they will replace the mentors again, or maybe they will simply close the project due to unprofitability. One thing is for sure: in the show "Voice" (season 4), reviews of the jury played an important role in reducing the interest of the audience. The project, as it began in 2012, has undergone significant changes. And it's not just the new faces of the judiciary. The participants also turned out to be much weaker than the previous ones.

In the first seasons we saw non-professionals with strong and sometimes unique vocals. Now the project has turned into another place of PR. How else to explain the arrival of the ex-participant of "House 2" and the host of the "Eagle and Tails" program, which were favorably accepted by the jury? The Voice (Season 4) is definitely not the same show as it used to be. Started as somethingfundamentally new, it is gradually turning into a conveyor, similar to the "Star Factory", which does not properly monitor the quality of its "products". Is the new jury of the show "Voice" (season 4) to blame for this? Reviews tend to be positive. Maybe the project is just adapting to the needs of modern TV and pop, changing its original principles?

The future of the updated show

Undoubtedly, the new season of the still popular program will not go anywhere from the Friday broadcast schedule. We will be able to watch the struggle of the remaining participants for the coveted victory to the end. But what will happen next? Will the show "Voice" (season 4), the reviews of the jury of which were so harsh and negative, the last in its history, or will we see this team in new releases? The question remains open, especially since there is no worthy alternative even to such a changed format. This means that no matter how much this topic is discussed, now the leadership of Channel One does not intend to change the composition of the jury in any way.

"Voice", season 4 (reviews from viewers are unlikely to do anything here), - the show is ambiguous. Although, who knows, maybe the indignation of the audience will subside, and the audience will get used to the frivolous Polina Gagarina, and to the biased Grigory Leps, and to the unformatted Basta, as, for example, they once got used to Alexander Borisovich. And then, quite possibly, for the new jury, "The Voice" (season 4) will also receive positive reviews.

For now, it's worth just watching the project for the sake of the most important thing - its contestants, who are already approaching the final fights. Whatever the formatTV show, the goal remains the same: to find a strong and professional voice. So the overall picture remains the same, on the stage of the country's main musical project, well-known, beautiful and complex compositions are again being performed to the accompaniment of a live orchestra. After all, this is the essence of the show "Voice" (Season 4). Reviews about the jury, opinions about the change of mentors and discussions of refereeing - all this is secondary. It remains only to try to enjoy the talent of the contestants, not paying attention to minor points.

Conclusion

Who knows, maybe it's temporary, and in the new season, the leadership of the "Voice", having listened to the reviews, will make its viewers happy with new masters in the judge's chairs, which the listeners will like more. Although no matter how professional the mentors of the popular show are, there are hardly any candidates that cause the approval of absolutely the entire audience. This means that even the most adequate and objective future of the jury may turn out to be in the same unsightly light as the current one, because the reaction of the public is always unpredictable.