What do architecture and music have in common? Relationship

2024 Author: Leah Sherlock | [email protected]. Last modified: 2023-12-17 05:25

“Architecture is frozen music” - this popular expression first escaped from the lips of Friedrich Wilhelm Joseph Schellings in 1842. Since then, many have begun to notice the relationship between the two art forms. Let's find out what architecture and music have in common, what aspects they have in common, and why this statement has played such an important role in philosophy and aesthetics.

Melody - what is it?

Before we get into the details of what music and architecture have in common, let's take a quick look at the basic tenets of each of these arts. The first in line will be the melody itself, the song, the work that we can hear. What does it consist of? First of all, it is rhythm, size, tempo, strokes. These aspects determine the mood of the melody, create this or that atmosphere. Moreover, in music there are numerous shades, plasticity, it has a beginning and an end, an exposition and a climax. However, all this terminology is familiar, perhaps, only to musicians - professionals and amateurs, but how do ordinary listeners define and distinguish music? They capture her style. It is this moment that is the key, due to which musical tastes and preferences are formed. It is the genre in which this or that song, play, sonata, romance, etc. is written, that can create a certain mood, atmosphere, aura.

Architecture Characteristics

We can start talking about what architecture and music have in common after we know the interpretation of the second term. Even a first-grader can tell about what architecture is. These are all the buildings that surround us, ranging from old, pompous and majestic churches and mansions, ending with modern - post-Soviet new buildings and skyscrapers made of glass. Architecture, as we can see, is divided into a lot of genres that are very different from each other. It also has its own "color", which creates a particular mood. Due to the building, made in one style or another, a certain aura and mood are created. In their creations, architects always express their own creative abilities, convey to the world a piece of their soul.

What's the difference?

Before we move on to a discussion of the question of what is common between architecture and music, we will establish for ourselves their differences. First, architecture is a “frozen” art that is stable. Anythe building is always static, you can admire it endlessly, without taking your eyes off it, it does not begin and end - it just exists. As for music, any work has an introductory part, a climax and an ending. You can enjoy the melody until the last note sounds. Secondly, any structures that architects and builders have worked on are intended for our eyes. We can look at them, admire, examine and photograph. But music is an art, caught by the ears. Having heard a certain set of sounds, our brain collects them into a single melody that we can enjoy for a short period of time.

Aesthetic similarities

Art - this "vulture" unites such concepts in our life as music and architecture. What do these industries have in common at first glance? To create a building in a certain style or work for any instrument requires a creator. In the first case, this is an architect, in the second, a composer. But both are creative individuals who think identically and pour their talents on paper. The second similarity is style. As noted above, any building has its own “color”, and the same can be said about musical plays. Moreover, in music and architecture genres strongly overlap. For example, the Baroque style, whose representative in architecture is Carlo Moderna, and in music - Antonio Lucio Vivaldi. Over the centuries, the process of changing eras and their philosophies has affected all areas of art. They seemed to keep up with the times, so they had similar features.

Technical similarities

It is necessary to turn to theory to find out exactly what is common between architecture and music from a technical point of view. First, let's look at the size. In musical works, it is always indicated at the very beginning of the musical staff. It can be 2/4, ¾, 6/8 and so on. The rhythm of the work, its emotional coloring and style depend on the size (i.e. 4/4 is a march, ¾ is a w altz and a minuet, etc.) In various buildings, size is also important. This refers not only to the height of the building, its width and length. The size and frequency of windows, doors, columns, portals and arches are also important, forms and transitions are important. The second aspect is strokes. In music, they are known by terms such as staccato (sharp, jerky) and legato (smooth, drawn out). In a frozen form, we see such touches in architecture. Anyone can distinguish a building that has a sharp, deliberate character from a house created on the basis of smooth, flowing lines and transitions.

Physics is the basic science

Many skeptics refuse to understand why architecture is often called frozen music until they see scientific proof. And everything lies in the ancient Russian system of sazhens, according to which our ancestors built houses, churches and public buildings. It's no secret that our world is a collection of waves that resonate in the area of specific objects.at one frequency or another. By erecting walls at a certain distance from each other, electromagnetic pillars are formed, which are combined into chords. It is believed that it was the fathom system that made it possible to create such energy structures that made it possible for people to feel better indoors: pressure normalized, various pains subsided. Why did it happen? The fact is that the frequency of the radiation of such electromagnetic pillars, which were combined into "chords", had a similar frequency with certain notes that can be played on any instrument.

If asked at school what is common between architecture and music

An essay on this topic is rarely given as a task to secondary school students, but in specialized educational institutions such a question may become relevant. In such cases, complex aspects from the category of physics and mathematics, of course, are not considered. Children are taught only general, aesthetic similarities. Mentioned above, they are the key answer to this question, because after all, we are talking directly about two types of art.